Actual claims in a previous by amount paid-out. Used a the basis for calculating upcoming premiums.


Persons examined as witnesses in a cause, who testify in regard to someprofessional or technical matter arising in the case, and who are permitted to give theiropinions as to such matter on account of their special training, skill, or familiarity with itAn expert is a person who possesses peculiar skill and knowledge upon the subjectmatterthat he is required to give an opinion upon. State v. Phair, 48 Vt. 366.An expert is a skillful or experienced person; a person having skill or experience, orpeculiar knowledge on certain subjects, or in certain professions ; a scientific witness.See Congress & E. Spring Co. v. Edgar, 99 U. S. 057, 25 L. Ed. 487; Ileald v. Thing, 45Me. 394; Nelson v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 71 N. Y. 460; Koccis v. State, 50 N. J. Law, 44,27 Atl. 800; Dole v. Johnson, 50 N. H. 453; Ellingwood v. Bragg, 52 N. H. 4S9.
In patent law, either a trial of an uncompleted mechanical structureto ascertain what changes or additions may be necessary to make it accomplish the designof the projector, or a trial of a completed machine to test or illustrate its practicalefficiency. In the former case, the inventor’s efforts, being incomplete, if they are thenabandoned, will have no effect upon the right of a subsequent inventor; but if theexperiment proves the capacity of the machine to effect what its inventor proposed, thelaw assigns to him the merit of having produced a complete invention. NorthwesternFire Extinguisher Co. v. Philadelphia Fire Extinguisher Co., 10 Phila. 227, 18 Fed. Cas.394.