Children born under a legitimate marriage follow the condition of the father.


Blamable; censurable; involving the breach of a legal duty or the commission of a fault. The term is not necessarily equivalent to Òcriminal,Ó for, in present use, and notwithstanding its derivation, it implies that the act or conduct spoken of Is reprehensible or wrong but not that it Involves malice or a guilty purpose. ÒCulpableÓ in fact connotes fault rather than guilt. Railway Co. v. Clayberg, 107 111. 051; Bank v. Wright, 8 Allen (Mass.) 121. As to culpable ÒHomicide,Ó ÒNeglect,Ó and ÒNegligence,Ó see those titles.Culpae poena par esto. Poena ad men- ?uram delicti statnenda est. Let the punishment be proportioned to the crime. Punishment is to be measured by the extent of the offense.
A person who is indicted for a criminal offense, but not yet convicted. It is not, however, a technical term of the law; and in its vernacular usage it seems to imply only a light degree of censure or moral reprobation. Blackstone believes it an abbreviation of the old forms of arraignment, whereby, on the prisoner’s pleading not guilty, the clerk would respond, “culpabilis. pr-it,” i. e., he is guilty and the crown is ready. It was (he says) the viva voce replication, by the clerk, on behalf of the crown, to the prisoner’s plea of non culpabilis; prit being a technical word, anciently in use in the formula of joining issue. 4 Bl. Comm. 339. But a more plausible explanation is that given by Donaldson, (cited Whart. Lex.,) as follows: The clerk asks the prisoner, “Are you guilty, or not guilty?” Prisoner “Not guilty.” Clerk, “Qu’il paroit, [may it prove so.] How will you be tried?” Prisoner, “By God and my country.” These words being hurried over, came to sound, “culprit, how will you be tried?” The ordinary derivation is from culpa.